Vercel is the default choice for Next.js hosting—it's built by the same team, after all. But as your traffic grows, so does your bill. That $20/month "Pro" plan can quickly balloon to hundreds or thousands when you factor in bandwidth overages, function invocations, and edge middleware costs.
If you're looking for Vercel alternatives that offer better pricing, more control, or different trade-offs, this guide compares the top options for hosting Next.js applications in 2025.
Why Developers Are Looking for Vercel Alternatives
The Pricing Problem
Vercel's pricing seems simple until you read the fine print:
- Bandwidth: 1TB included on Pro, then $40/100GB overage
- Serverless Function Execution: 1000 GB-hours on Pro, then $0.18/GB-hour
- Edge Middleware: 1M invocations included, then $0.65/million
- Image Optimization: 5000 images on Pro, then $5/1000
- Analytics: Extra cost
- Speed Insights: Extra cost
A moderately successful SaaS or e-commerce site can easily hit $500-2000/month on Vercel.
Other Concerns
- Vendor lock-in: Some Next.js features only work on Vercel
- Cold starts: Serverless functions have latency spikes
- Region limitations: Not all regions available on all plans
- Build minutes: Can run out on complex projects
Vercel Alternatives Comparison
| Platform | Starting Price | Best For | Next.js Support |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vercel | $20/mo (Pro) | Native Next.js, edge functions | Full (native) |
| Netlify | $19/mo (Pro) | JAMstack, static sites | Good (some limitations) |
| Railway | $5/mo + usage | Full-stack apps, databases | Full (standalone) |
| Render | $7/mo | Simple deployments | Full (standalone) |
| Fly.io | ~$5/mo + usage | Edge deployment, global | Full (standalone) |
| Cloudflare Pages | Free - $20/mo | Static + edge functions | Partial (via adapter) |
| VPS (Self-Hosted) | €4.49/mo | Full control, predictable costs | Full (standalone) |
Option 1: Netlify
Best for: Teams already using Netlify, JAMstack projects
Pros
- Similar DX to Vercel
- Great for static sites and JAMstack
- Generous free tier
- Built-in forms and identity
Cons
- Next.js support via adapter (some features missing)
- ISR (Incremental Static Regeneration) has limitations
- Bandwidth pricing similar to Vercel at scale
- Build minutes can be limiting
Pricing
- Free: 100GB bandwidth, 300 build minutes
- Pro: $19/member/mo, 1TB bandwidth
- Overages: $55/100GB bandwidth
Next.js Compatibility
# Deploy Next.js to Netlify
npm install -D @netlify/plugin-nextjs
# netlify.toml
[[plugins]]
package = "@netlify/plugin-nextjs"
Option 2: Railway
Best for: Full-stack apps with databases, startups
Pros
- Excellent developer experience
- Built-in PostgreSQL, Redis, MySQL
- Simple pricing (pay for resources used)
- No cold starts (always-on containers)
- Preview environments
Cons
- No edge functions
- US regions primarily (EU coming)
- Less mature than Vercel/Netlify
- Can get expensive at scale
Pricing
- Hobby: $5/mo + $0.000231/vCPU-minute + $0.000231/GB-minute
- Pro: $20/seat/mo + usage
- Typical small app: $10-30/mo
Deploy Next.js to Railway
# railway.json
{
"build": {
"builder": "NIXPACKS"
},
"deploy": {
"startCommand": "npm run start",
"healthcheckPath": "/api/health"
}
}
# Or just connect your repo - Railway auto-detects Next.js
Option 3: Render
Best for: Simple deployments, predictable pricing
Pros
- Straightforward pricing
- Free SSL, global CDN
- Built-in PostgreSQL
- Preview environments
- Easy to understand
Cons
- Cold starts on free tier
- No edge functions
- Limited regions
- Slower builds than Vercel
Pricing
- Free: 750 hours/mo (spins down after inactivity)
- Starter: $7/mo (512MB RAM, always on)
- Standard: $25/mo (2GB RAM)
- Bandwidth: 100GB included, then $0.10/GB
Deploy Next.js to Render
# render.yaml
services:
- type: web
name: my-nextjs-app
env: node
plan: starter
buildCommand: npm install && npm run build
startCommand: npm run start
healthCheckPath: /api/health
envVars:
- key: NODE_ENV
value: production
Option 4: Fly.io
Best for: Global edge deployment, low latency requirements
Pros
- Deploy to 30+ regions worldwide
- No cold starts (containers stay warm)
- Built-in PostgreSQL with read replicas
- WebSocket support
- Good for real-time apps
Cons
- Steeper learning curve
- Requires understanding containers
- Complex pricing model
- Not as polished DX as Vercel
Pricing
- Free: 3 shared VMs, 160GB bandwidth
- Pay-as-you-go: ~$0.0000022/s for shared CPU
- Typical app: $5-20/mo
Deploy Next.js to Fly.io
# Install Fly CLI
curl -L https://fly.io/install.sh | sh
# Initialize
fly launch
# fly.toml (generated)
[build]
[build.args]
NEXT_TELEMETRY_DISABLED = "1"
[env]
PORT = "3000"
[http_service]
internal_port = 3000
force_https = true
auto_stop_machines = true
auto_start_machines = true
# Deploy
fly deploy
Option 5: Cloudflare Pages
Best for: Static sites with some dynamic functionality, budget-conscious
Pros
- Extremely generous free tier
- Global edge network (fastest CDN)
- Workers for edge functions
- Excellent performance
- No bandwidth charges
Cons
- Limited Next.js support (needs adapter)
- No Node.js runtime (Workers only)
- Some Next.js features don't work
- Learning curve for Workers
Pricing
- Free: 500 builds/mo, unlimited bandwidth, 100K Workers requests/day
- Pro: $20/mo, 5000 builds/mo
Deploy Next.js to Cloudflare
# Install adapter
npm install @cloudflare/next-on-pages
# next.config.js
const nextConfig = {
output: 'standalone',
};
# Build for Cloudflare
npx @cloudflare/next-on-pages
# wrangler.toml
name = "my-nextjs-app"
compatibility_date = "2024-01-01"
pages_build_output_dir = ".vercel/output/static"
Note: Not all Next.js features work on Cloudflare. Check their compatibility docs.
Option 6: Self-Hosted VPS (Recommended for Control)
Best for: Full control, predictable costs, data sovereignty
Why Self-Host Next.js?
- Predictable costs: Fixed monthly price regardless of traffic
- Full control: No platform limitations
- Data sovereignty: Keep data in specific regions (GDPR)
- No vendor lock-in: Standard Node.js deployment
- Run anything: Add databases, caches, background jobs
Cost Comparison
| Monthly Traffic | Vercel Pro | DanubeData VPS | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100K pageviews | $20+ | €4.49 | ~75% |
| 500K pageviews | $50-100 | €4.49 | ~90% |
| 1M pageviews | $100-300 | €8.99 | ~95% |
| 5M pageviews | $500-1500 | €17.99 | >95% |
Deploy Next.js to VPS
Step 1: Provision VPS
- Create a VPS on DanubeData
- Choose Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
- Select Standard plan (€8.99/mo) or higher
Step 2: Install Node.js and PM2
# SSH into server
ssh root@your-server-ip
# Install Node.js 20
curl -fsSL https://deb.nodesource.com/setup_20.x | sudo -E bash -
apt install -y nodejs
# Install PM2 for process management
npm install -g pm2
# Install Caddy for reverse proxy
apt install -y debian-keyring debian-archive-keyring apt-transport-https
curl -1sLf 'https://dl.cloudsmith.io/public/caddy/stable/gpg.key' | gpg --dearmor -o /usr/share/keyrings/caddy-stable-archive-keyring.gpg
curl -1sLf 'https://dl.cloudsmith.io/public/caddy/stable/debian.deb.txt' | tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/caddy-stable.list
apt update && apt install caddy
Step 3: Deploy Your Next.js App
# Clone your repo
cd /var/www
git clone https://github.com/yourusername/your-nextjs-app.git
cd your-nextjs-app
# Install dependencies
npm ci --production=false
# Build
npm run build
# Start with PM2
pm2 start npm --name "nextjs" -- start
pm2 save
pm2 startup
Step 4: Configure Caddy
# /etc/caddy/Caddyfile
yourdomain.com {
reverse_proxy localhost:3000
encode gzip
header {
X-Content-Type-Options nosniff
X-Frame-Options DENY
Referrer-Policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
}
}
# Reload Caddy
systemctl reload caddy
Step 5: Set Up Auto-Deploy with GitHub Actions
# .github/workflows/deploy.yml
name: Deploy to VPS
on:
push:
branches: [main]
jobs:
deploy:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Deploy to VPS
uses: appleboy/ssh-action@v1.0.0
with:
host: ${{ secrets.VPS_HOST }}
username: ${{ secrets.VPS_USER }}
key: ${{ secrets.VPS_SSH_KEY }}
script: |
cd /var/www/your-nextjs-app
git pull origin main
npm ci --production=false
npm run build
pm2 restart nextjs
Self-Hosting Pros & Cons
Pros
- Fixed, predictable costs
- 20TB included bandwidth on DanubeData
- No function execution limits
- Full Node.js environment (any npm package)
- Run background jobs, WebSockets, anything
- Add your own database on same server
Cons
- You manage the server (updates, security)
- No automatic edge deployment
- Need to set up CI/CD yourself
- No automatic preview deployments (unless you build it)
Feature Comparison Matrix
| Feature | Vercel | Netlify | Railway | Render | Fly.io | VPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| App Router | Full | Full | Full | Full | Full | Full |
| Server Components | Full | Full | Full | Full | Full | Full |
| ISR | Native | Limited | Full | Full | Full | Full |
| Edge Functions | Native | Yes | No | No | Custom | No |
| Middleware | Edge | Edge | Node | Node | Node | Node |
| Image Optimization | Native | Plugin | Native | Native | Native | Native |
| Preview Deploys | Auto | Auto | Auto | Auto | Manual | Manual |
| Built-in DB | Postgres | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Any |
| WebSockets | Limited | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Recommendations by Use Case
For Startups on a Budget
Recommendation: VPS or Railway
Start with a €8.99/mo VPS. You get predictable costs, can run your database on the same server, and scale vertically as needed. If you prefer managed, Railway offers good value.
For High-Traffic Sites
Recommendation: VPS
Once you're past 1M pageviews, the cost difference becomes massive. A €17.99/mo VPS handles millions of requests while Vercel could cost $500+/mo.
For Edge/Global Performance
Recommendation: Fly.io or Vercel
If sub-50ms global latency is critical, edge deployment matters. Fly.io is more affordable, Vercel is easier.
For GDPR/Data Sovereignty
Recommendation: European VPS
DanubeData hosts in German data centers. Your data never leaves the EU, simplifying GDPR compliance.
For Side Projects/MVPs
Recommendation: Vercel Free or Render Free
Free tiers are fine for low-traffic projects. Move to VPS when you validate the idea.
Migration Guide: Vercel to VPS
Ready to migrate? Here's a quick checklist:
- Remove Vercel-specific features:
@vercel/og,@vercel/analytics, edge config - Update next.config.js: Remove
images.remotePatternsif using Vercel image optimization - Test locally:
npm run build && npm run start - Set up VPS: Follow the guide above
- Configure CI/CD: GitHub Actions or similar
- Update DNS: Point domain to new server
- Monitor: Set up uptime monitoring
Conclusion
Vercel is excellent for its developer experience and Next.js integration, but it's not the only option—and often not the most cost-effective one.
Choose Vercel if: DX is priority #1, you need edge functions, budget isn't a concern
Choose VPS if: You want predictable costs, full control, GDPR compliance, or high traffic
Choose Railway/Render if: You want managed hosting without Vercel's pricing
For most production applications, a €8.99/mo VPS offers the best balance of cost, control, and capability. You'll save hundreds or thousands per year while running a full Next.js application with complete feature support.
Get Started
Ready to deploy Next.js without the Vercel premium?
👉 Create Your Next.js VPS - Starting at €4.49/mo
DanubeData VPS includes:
- NVMe storage for fast builds
- 20TB included bandwidth (vs 1TB on Vercel Pro)
- German data center (GDPR compliant)
- Full root access
Need help migrating from Vercel? Contact our team—we've helped many teams make the switch.