BlogComparisonsServerless Containers vs VPS: Which Should You Choose in 2025?

Serverless Containers vs VPS: Which Should You Choose in 2025?

Adrian Silaghi
Adrian Silaghi
January 2, 2026
13 min read
45 views
#serverless #vps #containers #cloud-run #knative #infrastructure #cost-comparison

The serverless vs server debate has evolved. It's no longer just about Lambda functions vs EC2 instances—now we have serverless containers that blur the line between the two. Understanding when to use serverless containers versus traditional VPS hosting can save you thousands in infrastructure costs.

This guide compares serverless containers with VPS hosting across cost, performance, complexity, and use cases to help you make the right choice.

Understanding the Options

Traditional VPS (Virtual Private Server)

A dedicated virtual machine that runs 24/7. You get full control over the operating system, installed software, and configuration.

Examples: DanubeData VPS, DigitalOcean Droplets, AWS EC2, Linode

Serverless Containers

Containers that run on-demand and scale to zero when not in use. You pay only for the time your code is actually executing.

Examples: AWS Fargate, Google Cloud Run, Azure Container Instances, DanubeData Serverless

Functions as a Service (FaaS)

Event-driven functions that execute in response to triggers. More limited than containers but even more granular scaling.

Examples: AWS Lambda, Google Cloud Functions, Cloudflare Workers

Quick Comparison

Aspect VPS Serverless Containers FaaS
Pricing Model Fixed monthly Per-request + duration Per-invocation + duration
Cold Starts None 100ms-2s 100ms-10s
Scaling Manual/scripted Automatic Automatic
Max Runtime Unlimited Hours (varies) 15 min max
Control Full Container only Code only
Stateful Yes No (ephemeral) No
WebSockets Yes Limited No
Background Jobs Native Via triggers Via triggers

The Cost Math: When Serverless Gets Expensive

Serverless seems cheap until you do the math at scale.

VPS Cost (Fixed)

DanubeData VPS Small (2 vCPU, 4GB RAM):
€8.99/month = €0.012/hour

Available 24/7 = 720 hours/month
Effective cost per hour of availability: €0.012

Can handle: ~1000 concurrent requests (depending on app)
Cost per 1M requests (at 100ms avg): €0.012 × 720 = €8.99 total

Serverless Container Cost (Variable)

Google Cloud Run (comparable specs):
$0.00002400/vCPU-second + $0.00000250/GiB-second

For 1M requests at 100ms average, 2 vCPU, 4GB:
vCPU cost: 1M × 0.1s × 2 × $0.00002400 = $4.80
Memory cost: 1M × 0.1s × 4 × $0.00000250 = $1.00
Total: $5.80/month (~€5.40)

Serverless wins! ...but wait

The Break-Even Point

When does VPS become cheaper?

At ~2M requests/month (200ms avg response time):
- Serverless: $11.60/month
- VPS: €8.99/month

At 10M requests/month:
- Serverless: $58/month
- VPS: €8.99/month (same!)

At 50M requests/month:
- Serverless: $290/month
- VPS: €17.99/month (Medium VPS handles this)

Cost Summary by Traffic Level

Monthly Requests Serverless Cost VPS Cost Winner
100K ~$0.60 €8.99 Serverless
500K ~$2.90 €8.99 Serverless
1M ~$5.80 €8.99 Serverless
2M ~$11.60 €8.99 Break-even
5M ~$29 €8.99 VPS
10M ~$58 €8.99 VPS (6x cheaper)
50M ~$290 €17.99 VPS (16x cheaper)

Key insight: Serverless is economical for sporadic, low-traffic workloads. Once you have consistent traffic above ~2M requests/month, VPS is significantly cheaper.

The Cold Start Problem

Serverless containers "sleep" when not in use to save costs. Waking them up takes time.

Cold Start Latency

Platform Cold Start (min) Cold Start (typical)
AWS Lambda (Node.js) 100ms 200-500ms
AWS Lambda (Java) 500ms 3-10 seconds
Google Cloud Run 200ms 500ms-2s
Azure Container Instances 500ms 2-5 seconds
DanubeData Serverless 200ms 500ms-1.5s
VPS (always running) 0ms 0ms

When Cold Starts Matter

  • User-facing APIs: 2-second delays frustrate users
  • Real-time applications: Chat, gaming, live updates
  • Payment processing: Timeout risks during checkout
  • Health checks: Load balancers may mark cold containers as unhealthy

Mitigating Cold Starts

# Option 1: Minimum instances (Cloud Run)
# Keeps containers warm but adds baseline cost
gcloud run deploy my-service 
  --min-instances=1 
  --max-instances=100

# Option 2: Provisioned concurrency (Lambda)
# Pre-warms function instances
aws lambda put-provisioned-concurrency-config 
  --function-name my-function 
  --provisioned-concurrent-executions 10

# Option 3: Scheduled warm-up requests
# Ping your service every few minutes
# (Adds complexity and doesn't guarantee warm instances)

The irony: Once you add minimum instances to avoid cold starts, you're paying for always-on compute—similar to a VPS, but more expensive.

When to Choose Serverless Containers

Ideal Use Cases

  • Sporadic traffic: Internal tools used a few times per day
  • Batch processing: ETL jobs, report generation, data pipelines
  • Webhooks: GitHub/Stripe webhooks with unpredictable timing
  • Dev/staging environments: Scale to zero when not testing
  • Proof of concepts: Validate ideas without infrastructure commitment
  • Event-driven workloads: Process uploads, send notifications

Example: Webhook Handler

# Perfect serverless use case: Stripe webhook handler
# Receives 0-1000 webhooks/day with unpredictable timing

# main.py
from fastapi import FastAPI, Request
import stripe

app = FastAPI()

@app.post("/webhooks/stripe")
async def stripe_webhook(request: Request):
    payload = await request.body()
    sig_header = request.headers.get("stripe-signature")

    event = stripe.Webhook.construct_event(
        payload, sig_header, webhook_secret
    )

    if event.type == "payment_intent.succeeded":
        # Process payment
        pass

    return {"status": "success"}

# Deploy to DanubeData Serverless
# Scales to zero between webhooks
# Handles traffic spikes during sales

When to Choose VPS

Ideal Use Cases

  • Consistent traffic: APIs with steady request volume
  • Latency-sensitive: User-facing applications where every ms matters
  • Stateful applications: In-memory caches, connection pools
  • Background workers: Queue consumers, scheduled jobs
  • WebSockets: Real-time chat, live updates, gaming
  • Large applications: Complex apps with many dependencies
  • Cost optimization: Consistent workloads > 2M requests/month

Example: API Server

# VPS is better for: Production API with consistent traffic

# API handles 5M requests/month
# Needs sub-100ms latency
# Uses connection pooling to PostgreSQL
# Runs background job queue

# docker-compose.yml
services:
  api:
    build: .
    ports:
      - "8000:8000"
    environment:
      - DATABASE_URL=postgresql://...
      - REDIS_URL=redis://...
    restart: always

  worker:
    build: .
    command: celery -A app worker
    environment:
      - DATABASE_URL=postgresql://...
      - REDIS_URL=redis://...
    restart: always

# Cost: €17.99/month (VPS Medium)
# vs $145/month on serverless

# Latency: Consistent 50ms
# vs 50ms-2000ms with cold starts

The Hybrid Approach: Best of Both Worlds

Many production systems combine both approaches:

Architecture Pattern

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                         Internet                             │
└─────────────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────┘
                              │
                              ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                   VPS: Main Application                      │
│                                                              │
│  ┌──────────────┐  ┌──────────────┐  ┌──────────────┐       │
│  │   FastAPI    │  │    Redis     │  │   Workers    │       │
│  │   (API)      │  │   (Cache)    │  │   (Celery)   │       │
│  └──────────────┘  └──────────────┘  └──────────────┘       │
│                                                              │
│  Consistent traffic, low latency, stateful                   │
│  Cost: €17.99/month (fixed)                                  │
└───────────────────────────────┬─────────────────────────────┘
                                │
          ┌─────────────────────┼─────────────────────┐
          │                     │                     │
          ▼                     ▼                     ▼
┌─────────────────┐  ┌─────────────────┐  ┌─────────────────┐
│   Serverless    │  │   Serverless    │  │   Serverless    │
│   Image Resize  │  │   PDF Generate  │  │   Email Send    │
│                 │  │                 │  │                 │
│   Sporadic      │  │   Batch jobs    │  │   Event-driven  │
│   ~$2/month     │  │   ~$5/month     │  │   ~$1/month     │
└─────────────────┘  └─────────────────┘  └─────────────────┘

Implementation Example

# VPS: Main API (handles user requests)
@app.post("/orders")
async def create_order(order: OrderCreate):
    # Process order (VPS - consistent latency)
    db_order = await create_order_in_db(order)

    # Trigger serverless functions for heavy work
    # These can scale independently and run async

    # Resize product images (serverless)
    await trigger_serverless("resize-images", order.product_ids)

    # Generate invoice PDF (serverless)
    await trigger_serverless("generate-invoice", db_order.id)

    # Send confirmation email (serverless)
    await trigger_serverless("send-email", {
        "to": order.email,
        "template": "order_confirmation",
        "data": db_order
    })

    return db_order

# Serverless function: Image resize
# Only runs when needed, scales to zero
async def resize_images(product_ids: list):
    for product_id in product_ids:
        image = await download_image(product_id)
        resized = await resize(image, sizes=[100, 300, 800])
        await upload_to_s3(resized)

DanubeData Options: VPS and Serverless

DanubeData offers both approaches:

VPS Instances

Plan Specs Price Best For
Micro 1 vCPU, 2GB RAM €4.49/mo Small apps, development
Small 2 vCPU, 4GB RAM €8.99/mo Production APIs, web apps
Medium 4 vCPU, 8GB RAM €17.99/mo High-traffic, multi-service
Large 8 vCPU, 16GB RAM €35.99/mo Heavy workloads, ML inference

Serverless Containers

DanubeData Serverless uses Knative for scale-to-zero containers:

  • Scale to zero: Pay nothing when not running
  • Auto-scaling: Handle traffic spikes automatically
  • Docker support: Deploy any container image
  • Git deployment: Push to deploy from GitHub
  • Custom domains: Automatic TLS certificates

Decision Framework

Choose Serverless When:

  • ☐ Traffic is sporadic or unpredictable
  • ☐ Workload is event-driven (webhooks, triggers)
  • ☐ You need automatic scaling for traffic spikes
  • ☐ Cost optimization for low-traffic applications
  • ☐ Batch processing or background jobs
  • ☐ Development/staging environments

Choose VPS When:

  • ☐ Traffic is consistent (> 2M requests/month)
  • ☐ Latency is critical (need sub-100ms consistently)
  • ☐ Application is stateful (connection pools, caches)
  • ☐ Need WebSockets or long-running connections
  • ☐ Running background workers alongside API
  • ☐ Cost optimization for high-traffic applications

Choose Hybrid When:

  • ☐ Core API needs consistent performance (VPS)
  • ☐ Heavy async tasks can run separately (Serverless)
  • ☐ Different parts of system have different traffic patterns
  • ☐ Want to optimize costs across workload types

Migration Paths

Serverless to VPS

Common when serverless costs grow or cold starts become problematic:

# 1. Containerize your serverless function
# If not already containerized, create Dockerfile

# 2. Set up VPS with Docker
docker compose up -d

# 3. Update DNS/load balancer to point to VPS

# 4. Monitor and verify performance

# 5. Disable serverless functions

VPS to Serverless

Common for cost optimization of low-traffic services:

# 1. Ensure application is stateless
# - Move sessions to Redis
# - Remove local file storage
# - Use external database

# 2. Containerize if not already
# 3. Deploy to serverless platform
# 4. Test cold start latency
# 5. Update DNS
# 6. Decommission VPS

Conclusion

There's no universal "better" option—it depends on your specific workload:

Serverless containers excel for sporadic, event-driven workloads where you want to pay only for actual usage. They're perfect for webhooks, batch jobs, and low-traffic applications.

VPS hosting wins for consistent traffic, latency-sensitive applications, and workloads above ~2M requests/month. The fixed cost becomes dramatically cheaper than pay-per-request pricing at scale.

The hybrid approach gives you the best of both: run your core API on a VPS for consistent performance and cost, while offloading sporadic heavy tasks to serverless functions.

Get Started

Ready to deploy? DanubeData offers both options:

👉 Create a VPS - Starting at €4.49/month

👉 Deploy Serverless Container - Pay only for usage

Not sure which to choose? Contact our team for architecture guidance based on your specific workload.

Share this article

Ready to Get Started?

Deploy your infrastructure in minutes with DanubeData's managed services.